
Take a Photo. AI Fills the Form
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.
ELT (emergency locator transmitter) compliance software for CAMO and quality teams evidencing 14 CFR 91.207 clocks, 406 MHz registration, and battery expiry status.
ELT compliance software is the platform CAMO continuing airworthiness engineers and quality assurance managers use to evidence 406 MHz emergency locator transmitter compliance across a fleet. InspectWrk tracks the 14 CFR 91. 207 12-month statutory clock, battery replacement-before dates, Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz registration, self-test and G-switch records, and the closure of any finding in one defensible record per unit serial number aligned to EASA Part-M.
Available on Mobile
Inspect on iOS and Android with no internet required. Capture photos, let AI flag defects, and generate audit-ready reports in the field.
Today ELT compliance status lives across task cards, a registration file, and a spreadsheet of battery dates, and the quality manager assembles the fleet picture by emailing each base. When a 12-month inspection lapses, a battery passes its replacement-before date, or a registration drifts out of date after a unit swap, nobody sees it until a check or an audit finds it. Across a fleet of mixed types, compliance status is never current in one place.
What changes once ELT (emergency locator transmitter) compliance software runs on one mobile-first platform.
CAMO and quality teams follow this loop for the statutory 91.207 clock, registration evidence, battery expiry, and regulator readiness.
Assign QR identity to each 406 MHz emergency locator transmitter so it carries its statutory clock, registration, and battery status.
Configure the 14 CFR 91.207 12-month interval and the battery replacement-before date so each shows a clear compliant or due status.
Record the Cospas-Sarsat 406 MHz registration reference on the unit and flag it for update whenever the unit changes tail.
Self-test, inspection, and battery records are logged against the unit with photos and named sign-off as evidence.
A branded compliance pack exports per tail number, with findings closed and verified, when the authority asks.
Everything your field team does on paper, InspectWrk does automatically: faster, more accurate, and without the admin.

Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.

Inspectors speak their observations in any language. AI transcribes and fills the form in real time. Completely hands-free in the field.

The moment an inspection is submitted, a branded PDF, Excel, or CSV report generates automatically. No manual work. No waiting.

InspectWrk integrates with the tools your team already uses, including Zoho, Microsoft 365, and SAP. No double entry.

Your operations team sees completion rates, open issues, and compliance scores across all sites in real time. No chasing updates.
Manage every checklist in one connected workspace, capture evidence on mobile at the point of work, and let AI turn field inputs into clear, stakeholder-ready reports in minutes.


See which checklists your team has in progress across every site, jump into the same inspection with one tap, and keep field, supervisor, and back-office views in sync without sending screenshots on WhatsApp.


Every team reports differently. Build the report your operations, quality, or compliance leads actually want to read, share it as a branded PDF, and schedule delivery to the stakeholders who need it.


See completion, pass rate, and recurring findings across every checklist and every site, without pulling spreadsheets together at the end of the month.
What changes once ELT (emergency locator transmitter) compliance software is standardised on InspectWrk.







“InspectWrk transformed how we manage site safety inspections. The offline capability alone saved us countless hours. Our compliance rate jumped from 72% to 96% in just three months.”
Sarah Mitchell
Meridian Construction Group

“The AI-powered defect detection has changed how we work. Our inspectors capture photos and the system flags issues we'd have missed. It's like having an expert reviewer on every site visit.”
James Chen
Pacific Manufacturing Co.

“Rolling out digital checklists across multiple projects gave us instant visibility into recurring safety issues. We now resolve critical findings in hours instead of days.”
Olivia Carter
Northbridge Infrastructure
Get started with inspection and audit checklist templates.

Use this template to perform a comprehensive safety inspection of light vehicles. This check ensures all critical components are checked ...
The 12-month inspection interval set by 14 CFR 91.207 is tracked as a statutory clock per ELT, so each unit shows a clear compliant or due status rather than a date someone must recalculate. The platform raises staged alerts before the interval lapses, letting the CAMO team plan the inspection into a visit. Because the clock is tied to the specific serial number and tail, a beacon that moves between aircraft keeps its own compliance state. This removes the common failure where the due date drifts on a card and the statutory interval lapses unnoticed, which would be a direct airworthiness finding against the operator at the next check.
Yes. Each ELT record holds its 406 MHz registration reference with the national authority, such as NOAA in the US or the relevant CAA, alongside the unit serial number, battery status, and inspection clock. When a beacon is replaced or moves to another tail, the record flags that registration may need updating, so a unit does not sit in service with stale registration data. A stale registration can delay correct search and rescue tasking if the beacon ever activates, so keeping it current matters. Holding registration next to the compliance evidence reduces the chance of a mismatch surfacing during an audit or after an unintended activation.
Each emergency locator transmitter shows a compliant or expired battery status based on its replacement-before date from the manufacturer's CMM, tracked per serial number. The platform raises staged alerts before the date falls due, so the battery is planned rather than discovered overdue. A beacon past its replacement-before date is non-compliant the moment it dispatches, so the status view makes that visible to the quality team before it becomes a finding. The battery change, once done, is logged with photo evidence and named sign-off against the unit, so the compliance trail shows not just the current status but the full replacement history.
Every self-test, 12-month inspection, battery change, registration update, and finding closure is stored with a timestamp, the named person, and photo evidence against the specific serial number and tail. When an auditor asks for ELT compliance evidence, you export a scoped, branded compliance pack per aircraft covering the audit window in minutes. The pack shows the 91.207 clock status, battery expiry status, registration reference, self-test records, and the closure of any finding with verified sign-off. This replaces the photocopy-and-search routine that binders force, and the evidence is consistent across every base in the fleet rather than assembled from separate spreadsheets.
The dashboard rolls up compliant, due, and overdue ELT status across every tail number, so the quality manager sees fleet compliance at a glance instead of emailing each base for its records. Filters by type, base, and clock let the team focus on the units approaching a statutory due date or a battery expiry. Anything overdue is visible immediately, not discovered at the next check. This gives the operator a current, single source of ELT compliance truth, rather than a status picture that is always a few days stale because it was assembled by hand from separate base records.
Yes. Capture works fully offline on iOS and Android, which matters in the hangar, on the line, and at remote stands where signal is weak. Line teams log self-test, inspection, and battery evidence at the unit while offline, and records sync automatically once the device reconnects. Capturing evidence at the point of work, with the correct timestamp, keeps the compliance trail accurate rather than reconstructed later from memory. This matters because compliance evidence assembled after the fact is exactly the kind of trail an auditor probes, whereas point-of-work capture stands up to scrutiny.
Last updated: